<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Page Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.launchpad.net/general/legal-page-updates/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.launchpad.net/general/legal-page-updates</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the Launchpad team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:43:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: troy_s</title>
		<link>http://blog.launchpad.net/general/legal-page-updates/comment-page-1#comment-6610</link>
		<dc:creator>troy_s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.launchpad.net/general/legal-page-updates#comment-6610</guid>
		<description>Somehow this seems rather unfortunate.

There is no more elusive and misunderstood term than branding in our FLOSS community.  You can&#039;t create &#039;branding integrity&#039;.  You can&#039;t even create &#039;branding&#039;.  An extremely wise designer once said &quot;A logo is not a brand unless it is on a cow.&quot;

Second, perhaps it would be wise to polish the wordmark up to the point that one might not want to change it.  A glaring issue might be the unfortunate kerning between the c h p triplet, and to a lesser degree, the a and the d.  The typographic colour is a little shy of consistent.

Had the sources been obviously obtainable somewhere, and given an appropriate license that would encourage some twiddling, someone might have done this already.

Sincerely,
TJS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow this seems rather unfortunate.</p>
<p>There is no more elusive and misunderstood term than branding in our FLOSS community.  You can&#8217;t create &#8216;branding integrity&#8217;.  You can&#8217;t even create &#8216;branding&#8217;.  An extremely wise designer once said &#8220;A logo is not a brand unless it is on a cow.&#8221;</p>
<p>Second, perhaps it would be wise to polish the wordmark up to the point that one might not want to change it.  A glaring issue might be the unfortunate kerning between the c h p triplet, and to a lesser degree, the a and the d.  The typographic colour is a little shy of consistent.</p>
<p>Had the sources been obviously obtainable somewhere, and given an appropriate license that would encourage some twiddling, someone might have done this already.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
TJS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jldugger</title>
		<link>http://blog.launchpad.net/general/legal-page-updates/comment-page-1#comment-6609</link>
		<dc:creator>jldugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.launchpad.net/general/legal-page-updates#comment-6609</guid>
		<description>So what does this mean for say, Lenov?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what does this mean for say, Lenov?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
